linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup/cpuset: remove kernfs active break

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ad9802d1-b5e2-4866-b494-499e9e05aa5e@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:07:47 +0800
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, hannes@...xchg.org, mkoutny@...e.com,
 cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup/cpuset: remove kernfs active break



On 2025/1/9 9:55, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 09:29:59AM +0800, Chen Ridong wrote:
>> Hi, Tj and Longman, I am sorry, the fix tag is not exactly right. I just
>> failed to reproduce this issue at the version 5.10, and I found this
>> warning was added with the commit bdb2fd7fc56e ("kernfs: Skip
>> kernfs_drain_open_files() more aggressively"), which is at version 6.1.
>> I believe it should both fix  bdb2fd7fc56e ("kernfs: Skip
>> kernfs_drain_open_files() more aggressively") and 76bb5ab8f6e3 ("cpuset:
>> break kernfs active protection in cpuset_write_resmask()"). Should I
>> resend a new patch?
> 
> No worries. I updated the commit in place.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Thank you very much.

Best regards,
Ridong