linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup/cpuset: remove kernfs active break

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z38sopf57DAusY9I@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:55:46 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, hannes@...xchg.org, mkoutny@...e.com,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup/cpuset: remove kernfs active break

On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 09:29:59AM +0800, Chen Ridong wrote:
> Hi, Tj and Longman, I am sorry, the fix tag is not exactly right. I just
> failed to reproduce this issue at the version 5.10, and I found this
> warning was added with the commit bdb2fd7fc56e ("kernfs: Skip
> kernfs_drain_open_files() more aggressively"), which is at version 6.1.
> I believe it should both fix  bdb2fd7fc56e ("kernfs: Skip
> kernfs_drain_open_files() more aggressively") and 76bb5ab8f6e3 ("cpuset:
> break kernfs active protection in cpuset_write_resmask()"). Should I
> resend a new patch?

No worries. I updated the commit in place.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun