[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <752e62938a254fef863eebdf4d85e759@realtek.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 01:55:23 +0000
From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
To: Liang Jie <buaajxlj@....com>
CC: "kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>, Bernie Huang <phhuang@...ltek.com>,
"fanggeng@...iang.com" <fanggeng@...iang.com>,
"yangchen11@...iang.com"
<yangchen11@...iang.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liang Jie <liangjie@...iang.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] wifi: rtw89: Correct immediate cfg_len calculation for scan_offload_be
Liang Jie <buaajxlj@....com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
> index 2191c037d72e..2be1bee724ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
> @@ -5170,6 +5170,7 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_scan_offload_be(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
> u8 opch_size = sizeof(*opch) * option->num_opch;
> u8 probe_id[NUM_NL80211_BANDS];
> u8 cfg_len = sizeof(*h2c);
> + u8 ver = U8_MAX;
> unsigned int cond;
> void *ptr;
> int ret;
In reverse X'mas tree. Otherwise, looks good to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists