lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z4GYv9YmT38OgQAn@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 19:01:35 -0300
From: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Santos <Jonathan.Santos@...log.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>, lars@...afoo.de,
	Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/15] iio: adc: ad7768-1: Move buffer allocation to a
 separate function

On 01/07, Jonathan Santos wrote:
> From: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>
> 
> This change moves the buffer allocation in a separate function, making
> space for adding another type of iio buffer if needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ad7768-1.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
...
> @@ -625,37 +661,11 @@ static int ad7768_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	st->trig = devm_iio_trigger_alloc(&spi->dev, "%s-dev%d",
> -					  indio_dev->name,
> -					  iio_device_id(indio_dev));
> -	if (!st->trig)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	st->trig->ops = &ad7768_trigger_ops;
> -	iio_trigger_set_drvdata(st->trig, indio_dev);
> -	ret = devm_iio_trigger_register(&spi->dev, st->trig);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	indio_dev->trig = iio_trigger_get(st->trig);
> -
> -	init_completion(&st->completion);

Isn't the completion also used for single-shot reads?
Well, if triggered_buffer_setup fails the whole probe fails and we never get to
do a single-shot read, but that makes me wonder ... why don't we ever try to
recover from iio_triggered_buffer_setup()? Should we ever do so?

> -
>  	ret = ad7768_set_channel_label(indio_dev, ARRAY_SIZE(ad7768_channels));
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = devm_request_irq(&spi->dev, spi->irq,
> -			       &ad7768_interrupt,
> -			       IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> -			       indio_dev->name, indio_dev);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(&spi->dev, indio_dev,
> -					      &iio_pollfunc_store_time,
> -					      &ad7768_trigger_handler,
> -					      &ad7768_buffer_ops);
> +	ret = ad7768_triggered_buffer_alloc(indio_dev);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ