[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA1CXcDx00znQZGB=_PE4iQP3upbot-KJ5uXWbEPTtRuA7n2kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 15:01:01 -0700
From: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, ryan.roberts@....com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, cl@...two.org,
vbabka@...e.cz, mhocko@...e.com, apopple@...dia.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, will@...nel.org, baohua@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
srivatsa@...il.mit.edu, haowenchao22@...il.com, hughd@...gle.com,
aneesh.kumar@...nel.org, yang@...amperecomputing.com, peterx@...hat.com,
ioworker0@...il.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, ziy@...dia.com,
jglisse@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com, vishal.moola@...il.com,
zokeefe@...gle.com, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com, jhubbard@...dia.com,
21cnbao@...il.com, willy@...radead.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
david@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com, raquini@...hat.com,
sunnanyong@...wei.com, usamaarif642@...il.com, audra@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] khugepaged: mTHP support
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 9:56 PM Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/01/25 7:57 am, Nico Pache wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 11:22 PM Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/01/25 5:01 am, Nico Pache wrote:
> >>> The following series provides khugepaged and madvise collapse with the
> >>> capability to collapse regions to mTHPs.
> >>>
> >>> To achieve this we generalize the khugepaged functions to no longer depend
> >>> on PMD_ORDER. Then during the PMD scan, we keep track of chunks of pages
> >>> (defined by MTHP_MIN_ORDER) that are fully utilized. This info is tracked
> >>> using a bitmap. After the PMD scan is done, we do binary recursion on the
> >>> bitmap to find the optimal mTHP sizes for the PMD range. The restriction
> >>> on max_ptes_none is removed during the scan, to make sure we account for
> >>> the whole PMD range. max_ptes_none is mapped to a 0-100 range to
> >>> determine how full a mTHP order needs to be before collapsing it.
> >>>
> >>> Some design choices to note:
> >>> - bitmap structures are allocated dynamically because on some arch's
> >>> (like PowerPC) the value of MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE cannot be computed at
> >>> compile time leading to warnings.
> >>> - The recursion is masked through a stack structure.
> >>> - A MTHP_MIN_ORDER was added to compress the bitmap, and ensure it was
> >>> 64bit on x86. This provides some optimization on the bitmap operations.
> >>> if other arches/configs that have larger than 512 PTEs per PMD want to
> >>> compress their bitmap further we can change this value per arch.
> >>>
> >>> Patch 1-2: Some refactoring to combine madvise_collapse and khugepaged
> >>> Patch 3: A minor "fix"/optimization
> >>> Patch 4: Refactor/rename hpage_collapse
> >>> Patch 5-7: Generalize khugepaged functions for arbitrary orders
> >>> Patch 8-11: The mTHP patches
> >>>
> >>> This series acts as an alternative to Dev Jain's approach [1]. The two
> >>> series differ in a few ways:
> >>> - My approach uses a bitmap to store the state of the linear scan_pmd to
> >>> then determine potential mTHP batches. Devs incorporates his directly
> >>> into the scan, and will try each available order.
> >>> - Dev is attempting to optimize the locking, while my approach keeps the
> >>> locking changes to a minimum. I believe his changes are not safe for
> >>> uffd.
> >>> - Dev's changes only work for khugepaged not madvise_collapse (although
> >>> i think that was by choice and it could easily support madvise)
> >>> - Dev scales all khugepaged sysfs tunables by order, while im removing
> >>> the restriction of max_ptes_none and converting it to a scale to
> >>> determine a (m)THP threshold.
> >>> - Dev turns on khugepaged if any order is available while mine still
> >>> only runs if PMDs are enabled. I like Dev's approach and will most
> >>> likely do the same in my PATCH posting.
> >>> - mTHPs need their ref count updated to 1<<order, which Dev is missing.
> >>>
> >>> Patch 11 was inspired by one of Dev's changes.
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241216165105.56185-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
> >>>
> >>> Nico Pache (11):
> >>> introduce khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd to collapse a single pmd
> >>> khugepaged: refactor madvise_collapse and khugepaged_scan_mm_slot
> >>> khugepaged: Don't allocate khugepaged mm_slot early
> >>> khugepaged: rename hpage_collapse_* to khugepaged_*
> >>> khugepaged: generalize hugepage_vma_revalidate for mTHP support
> >>> khugepaged: generalize alloc_charge_folio for mTHP support
> >>> khugepaged: generalize __collapse_huge_page_* for mTHP support
> >>> khugepaged: introduce khugepaged_scan_bitmap for mTHP support
> >>> khugepaged: add mTHP support
> >>> khugepaged: remove max_ptes_none restriction on the pmd scan
> >>> khugepaged: skip collapsing mTHP to smaller orders
> >>>
> >>> include/linux/khugepaged.h | 4 +-
> >>> mm/huge_memory.c | 3 +-
> >>> mm/khugepaged.c | 436 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >>> 3 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Before I take a proper look at your series, can you please include any testing
> >> you may have done?
> >
> > I Built these changes for the following arches: x86_64, arm64,
> > arm64-64k, ppc64le, s390x
> >
> > x86 testing:
> > - Selftests mm
> > - some stress-ng tests
> > - compile kernel
> > - I did some tests with my defer [1] set on top. This pushes all the
> > work to khugepaged, which removes the noise of all the PF allocations.
> >
> > I recently got an ARM64 machine and did some simple sanity tests (on
> > both 4k and 64k) like selftests, stress-ng, and playing around with
> > the tunables, etc.
> >
> > I will also be running all the builds through our CI, and perf testing
> > environments before posting.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240729222727.64319-1-npache@redhat.com/
> >
> >>
> >
> I tested your series with the program I was using and it is not working;
> can you please confirm it.
Yes, this is expected because you are not fully filling any 32K chunk
(MIN_MTHP_ORDER) so no bit is ever set.
I should probably add some threshold to scan_pmd so we set the bitmap
if at least half of the region is full or scale it on max_ptes_none
like I do in scan_bitmap.
Thanks for your review-- Have a good weekend!
>
> diff --git a/mytests/mthp.c b/mytests/mthp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e3029dbcf035
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mytests/mthp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + *
> + * Author: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
> + *
> + * Program to test khugepaged mTHP collapse
> + */
> +
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <sys/mman.h>
> +#include <sys/time.h>
> +#include <sys/random.h>
> +#include <assert.h>
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> + char *ptr;
> + unsigned long mthp_size = (1UL << 16);
> + size_t chunk_size = (1UL << 25);
> +
> + ptr = mmap((void *)(1UL << 30), chunk_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> + if (((unsigned long)ptr) != (1UL << 30)) {
> + printf("mmap did not work on required address\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + /* Fill first pte in every 64K interval */
> + for (int i = 0; i < chunk_size; i += mthp_size)
> + ptr[i] = i;
> +
> + if (madvise(ptr, chunk_size, MADV_HUGEPAGE)) {
> + perror("madvise");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + sleep(100);
> + return 0;
> +}
> --
> 2.30.2
>
> Set enabled = madvise, hugepages-2048k/enabled = hugepages-64k/enabled =
> inherit. Run the program in the background, then run tools/mm/thpmaps.
> You will see PMD collapse correctly, but when you echo never into
> hugepages-2048k/enabled and test this again, you won't see contpte 64K
> collapse. With my series, you will see something like
>
> anon-cont-pte-aligned-64kB : 32768 kB (100%).
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists