[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2wsi6sehglavj75jr5gugdq6oqtor7gonx5zhmetzqwvfwc5gn@e3xlsfvygfgj>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:39:16 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Wongi Lee <qwerty@...ori.io>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, Eugenio PĂ©rez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@...hat.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] vsock/virtio: discard packets if the transport
changes
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 02:34:28PM +0100, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>On 1/8/25 19:06, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> If the socket has been de-assigned or assigned to another transport,
>> we must discard any packets received because they are not expected
>> and would cause issues when we access vsk->transport.
>>
>> A possible scenario is described by Hyunwoo Kim in the attached link,
>> where after a first connect() interrupted by a signal, and a second
>> connect() failed, we can find `vsk->transport` at NULL, leading to a
>> NULL pointer dereference.
>>
>> Fixes: c0cfa2d8a788 ("vsock: add multi-transports support")
>> Reported-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
>> Reported-by: Wongi Lee <qwerty@...ori.io>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/Z2LvdTTQR7dBmPb5@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX/
>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> index 9acc13ab3f82..51a494b69be8 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> @@ -1628,8 +1628,11 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
>>
>> lock_sock(sk);
>>
>> - /* Check if sk has been closed before lock_sock */
>> - if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE)) {
>> + /* Check if sk has been closed or assigned to another transport before
>> + * lock_sock (note: listener sockets are not assigned to any transport)
>> + */
>> + if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE) ||
>> + (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN && vsk->transport != &t->transport)) {
>> (void)virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb);
>> release_sock(sk);
>> sock_put(sk);
>
>FWIW, I've tried simplifying Hyunwoo's repro to toy with some tests. Ended
>up with
>
>```
>from threading import *
>from socket import *
>from signal import *
>
>def listener(tid):
> while True:
> s = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_SEQPACKET)
> s.bind((1, 1234))
> s.listen()
> pthread_kill(tid, SIGUSR1)
>
>signal(SIGUSR1, lambda *args: None)
>Thread(target=listener, args=[get_ident()]).start()
>
>while True:
> c = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_SEQPACKET)
> c.connect_ex((1, 1234))
> c.connect_ex((42, 1234))
>```
>
>which gives me splats with or without this patch.
Thanks again for the repro, it worked for me, only if a G2H transport
wasn't loaeded (e.g. virtio-vsock driver).
I tested on the v2 I just sent [1], and I can't see the kernel oops
anymore, but please do test/review too.
Thanks,
Stefano
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250110083511.30419-1-sgarzare@redhat.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists