[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250110080331.04645768@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 08:03:31 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Yeking@...54.com
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, "Theodore Ts'o"
<tytso@....edu>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Andy
Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Dwaipayan Ray
<dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Jacob
Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add short author date to Fixes tag
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:20:09 +0000
Yeking@...54.com wrote:
> The old Fixes tag style is at least 10 years old. It lacks date
> information, which can lead to misjudgment. So I added short author date
> to avoid this. This make it clear at a glance and reduce
> misunderstandings.
How can it lead to misjudgment? If you have two or more hashes matching, do
you really think they'll have the same subjects?
I do not plan on doing this. It's pointless.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists