[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250112120530.1950a265@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:05:30 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Santos <Jonathan.Santos@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lars@...afoo.de,
Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/15] dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad7768-1: add
synchronization over SPI property
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 18:51:06 -0300
Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com> wrote:
> On 01/07, Jonathan Santos wrote:
> > Add adi,sync-in-spi property to enable synchronization over SPI.
> > This should be used in the case when the GPIO cannot provide a
> > pulse synchronous with the base MCLK signal.
> >
> > User can choose between SPI, GPIO synchronization or neither of them,
> > but only if a external pulse can be provided, for example, by another
> > device in a multidevice setup.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Santos <Jonathan.Santos@...log.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7768-1.yaml | 24 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7768-1.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7768-1.yaml
> > index 3ce59d4d065f..55cec27bfe60 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7768-1.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7768-1.yaml
> > @@ -47,6 +47,15 @@ properties:
> > in any way, for example if the filter decimation rate changes.
> > As the line is active low, it should be marked GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW.
> >
> > + adi,sync-in-spi:
> > + description:
> > + Enables synchronization of multiple devices over SPI. This property is
> > + used when a signal synchronous to the base MCLK signal cannot be provided
> > + via GPIO. It requires the SYNC_OUT pin to be connected to the SYNC_IN pin
> > + on the ADC. In the case of multiple devices, the SYNC_OUT pin of one device
> > + should be routed to the SYNC_IN pins of the other devices.
> So, if I'm getting it right,
Datasheet on this is indeed complex!
>/SYNC_IN may be driven by a GPIO (ADAQ7768-1 datasheet Figure 131),
For that we expose a gpio binding already. If that's present we know what is going on.
>/SYNC_IN may be driven by own device /SYNC_OUT (ADAQ7768-1 datasheet Figure 133),
This is the default - no information provided so it isn't wired externally.
We don't normally bother to describe required chip to chip connections.
I couldn't entirely figure out if this is 'required' if we aren't driving explicitly
from GPIO or another chip but i think it is(?).
>/SYNC_IN may be driven by other AD7768-1 > /SYNC_OUT pin (also Figure 133).
This is only case we are about for sync in I think.
As long as there isn't a valid 'not connected' It think we are fine with a boolean.
> That is too much to describe with a boolean.
>
> If David's suggestion of using a trigger-source doesn't fit, this property
> should at least become an enum or string.
>
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > reset-gpios:
> > maxItems: 1
> >
> > @@ -65,7 +74,6 @@ required:
> > - vref-supply
> > - spi-cpol
> > - spi-cpha
> > - - adi,sync-in-gpios
> >
> > patternProperties:
> > "^channel@([0-9]|1[0-5])$":
> > @@ -89,6 +97,20 @@ patternProperties:
> > allOf:
> > - $ref: /schemas/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml#
> >
> > + # adi,sync-in-gpios and adi,sync-in-spi are mutually exclusive (neither is also valid)
> > + - if:
> > + required:
> > + - adi,sync-in-gpios
> > + then:
> > + properties:
> > + adi,sync-in-spi: false
> > + - if:
> > + required:
> > + - adi,sync-in-spi
> > + then:
> > + properties:
> > + adi,sync-in-gpios: false
> > +
> > unevaluatedProperties: false
> >
> > examples:
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists