[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c73cee2-a4aa-4e85-bafd-d5571e857849@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:59:08 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Tanya Agarwal <tanyaagarwal25699@...il.com>
Cc: casey@...aufler-ca.com, takedakn@...data.co.jp,
john.johansen@...onical.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
zohar@...ux.ibm.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, eric.snowberg@...cle.com, mic@...ikod.net,
gnoack@...gle.com, stephen.smalley.work@...il.com, omosnace@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apparmor@...ts.ubuntu.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, anupnewsmail@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] security: fix typos and spelling errors
On 2025/01/13 1:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> Hi Tanya,
>
> Ideally this patchset would be split into into seperate, independent
> patches, one for AppArmor, one for IMA/EVM, one for Landlock, one for
> SELinux, one for Smack, and one for TOMOYO.
I don't think we need to split this patchset into individual modules,
especially because this patchset does not affect the result of kernel build.
We sometimes need to do "git bisect", and reducing number of commits helps
saving building time and testing time for bisection.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists