lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c73cee2-a4aa-4e85-bafd-d5571e857849@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:59:08 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Tanya Agarwal <tanyaagarwal25699@...il.com>
Cc: casey@...aufler-ca.com, takedakn@...data.co.jp,
        john.johansen@...onical.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
        zohar@...ux.ibm.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
        dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, eric.snowberg@...cle.com, mic@...ikod.net,
        gnoack@...gle.com, stephen.smalley.work@...il.com, omosnace@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apparmor@...ts.ubuntu.com,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org, anupnewsmail@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] security: fix typos and spelling errors

On 2025/01/13 1:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> Hi Tanya,
> 
> Ideally this patchset would be split into into seperate, independent
> patches, one for AppArmor, one for IMA/EVM, one for Landlock, one for
> SELinux, one for Smack, and one for TOMOYO.

I don't think we need to split this patchset into individual modules,
especially because this patchset does not affect the result of kernel build.
We sometimes need to do "git bisect", and reducing number of commits helps
saving building time and testing time for bisection.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ