[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQxxwyDkXvN5S7XbbbJTk5-LN3MXteX+F+Bx0wTxujhow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:56:27 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Tanya Agarwal <tanyaagarwal25699@...il.com>, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
takedakn@...data.co.jp, john.johansen@...onical.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, eric.snowberg@...cle.com, mic@...ikod.net,
gnoack@...gle.com, stephen.smalley.work@...il.com, omosnace@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apparmor@...ts.ubuntu.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, anupnewsmail@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] security: fix typos and spelling errors
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 7:00 PM Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> On 2025/01/13 1:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> > Hi Tanya,
> >
> > Ideally this patchset would be split into into seperate, independent
> > patches, one for AppArmor, one for IMA/EVM, one for Landlock, one for
> > SELinux, one for Smack, and one for TOMOYO.
>
> I don't think we need to split this patchset into individual modules,
> especially because this patchset does not affect the result of kernel build.
> We sometimes need to do "git bisect", and reducing number of commits helps
> saving building time and testing time for bisection.
Merge conflicts and spending time having to coordinate maintainer ACKs
is a real time cost.
Split the patch please.
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists