linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: simple-card: Drop unnecessary "dai-tdm-slot-width-map" property presence check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <173678400663.55486.1485118696430886210.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 16:00:06 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>, 
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: simple-card: Drop unnecessary
 "dai-tdm-slot-width-map" property presence check

On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 12:22:02 -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> It doesn't matter whether "dai-tdm-slot-width-map" is not present or
> there is some other issue parsing it in of_property_count_elems_of_size()
> causing an error. Drop the presence check and rely on
> of_property_count_elems_of_size() error return if not present.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: simple-card: Drop unnecessary "dai-tdm-slot-width-map" property presence check
      commit: abea0cbfba5848d11b6364e82df4864fd0bfa683

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark