linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] btrfs: selftests: Fix spelling mistake "suceeded" -> "succeeded"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a0250e02-ddf4-425b-8b9c-21fe57110c26@wdc.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:30:19 +0000
From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef
 Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Filipe Manana
	<fdmanana@...e.com>, "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] btrfs: selftests: Fix spelling mistake "suceeded"
 -> "succeeded"

On 13.01.25 10:18, Colin Ian King wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in two test_err messages. Fix them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
> index 6c7e561e5564..6747350a05f5 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static int test_delete_two_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
>   	ret = btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset(fs_info, logical1, &len1, map_type,
>   					   0, &io_stripe);
>   	if (ret != -ENODATA) {
> -		test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] suceeded, should fail\n",
> +		test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] succeeded, should fail\n",
>   			 logical1, len1);
>   		goto out;
>   	}
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int test_delete_two_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
>   	ret = btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset(fs_info, logical2, &len2, map_type,
>   					   0, &io_stripe);
>   	if (ret != -ENODATA) {
> -		test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] suceeded, should fail\n",
> +		test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] succeeded, should fail\n",
>   			 logical2, len2);
>   		goto out;
>   	}

Oops, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>