lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <173677598052.1702137.6360834668377737017.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:46:36 -0600
From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
To: Ciprian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	Christophe Lizzi <clizzi@...hat.com>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	Enric Balletbo <eballetb@...hat.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, NXP S32 Linux <s32@....com>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alberto Ruiz <aruizrui@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3 RESEND] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add
 S32G2/S32G3 SoC support


On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:07:02 +0200, Ciprian Costea wrote:
> From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
> 
> Add S32G2/S32G3 SoCs compatible strings.
> 
> A particularity for these SoCs is the presence of separate interrupts for
> state change, bus errors, MBs 0-7 and MBs 8-127 respectively.
> 
> Increase maxItems of 'interrupts' to 4 for S32G based SoCs and keep the
> same restriction for other SoCs.
> 
> Also, as part of this commit, move the 'allOf' after the required
> properties to make the documentation easier to read.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/net/can/fsl,flexcan.yaml         | 44 +++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 


Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Missing tags:

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ