linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] iio: hid-sensor-attributes: validate sensitivity attributes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9929d10e1d61f63e4fe461eea9efc42eb91fa44a.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 09:12:54 -0800
From: srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@...onical.com>, Jonathan Cameron
	 <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Peter Zijlstra
	 <peterz@...radead.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina
	 <jikos@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: hid-sensor-attributes: validate sensitivity
 attributes

On Tue, 2025-01-14 at 05:28 -0800, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-01-14 at 15:02 +0800, Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) wrote:
> > An invalid sensor device was observed in HP 5MP Camera (USB ID
> > 0408:5473)
> > which provided valid index and report_ids for poll, report_state
> > and
> > power_state attributes, but had invalid report_latency,
> > sensitivity,
> > and
> > timestamp attributes. This would cause the system to hang when
> > using
> > iio_info to access attributes, as runtime PM tried to wake up an
> > unresponsive sensor.
> > 
> > Fix this by validating both sensitivity.index and
> > sensitivity_rel.index
> > during sensor probe. Since valid sensors must initialize these with
> > non-negative values, reject the sensor if either index is negative.
> > 
> 
> These are optional fields by spec. So we can't reject sensor. I worry
> that this will cause more regressions.
> 
> We will need a blocked list. We don't process "Persistent Unique ID"
> or
> "Sensor Manufacturer/Model". Please check if the report descriptors
> have any of these fields described in section 1.5 of spec.
> 
> > 
We probably may not be able to read the above features, I suggest add
this device Vendor=0408 ProdID=5473 
hid_ignore_list[].

Thanks,
Srinivas



> > [    2.594565] [453] hid-sensor-hub 0003:0408:5473.0003: Report
> > latency attributes: ffffffff:ffffffff
> > [    2.594573] [453] hid-sensor-hub 0003:0408:5473.0003: common
> > attributes: 5:1, 2:1, 3:1 ffffffff:ffffffff ffffffff:ffffffff
> > [    2.595485] [453] hid-sensor-hub 0003:0408:5473.0003: Report
> > latency attributes: ffffffff:ffffffff
> > [    2.595492] [453] hid-sensor-hub 0003:0408:5473.0003: common
> > attributes: 5:11, 3:11, 1:11 ffffffff:ffffffff ffffffff:ffffffff
> > 
> > T:  Bus=03 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=03 Cnt=01 Dev#=  2 Spd=480  MxCh= 0
> > D:  Ver= 2.01 Cls=ef(misc ) Sub=02 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
> > P:  Vendor=0408 ProdID=5473 Rev=00.07
> > S:  Manufacturer=Quanta
> > S:  Product=HP 5MP Camera
> > S:  SerialNumber=01.00.00
> > C:  #Ifs= 6 Cfg#= 1 Atr=a0 MxPwr=500mA
> > I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=0e(video) Sub=01 Prot=01
> > Driver=uvcvideo
> > E:  Ad=87(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  16 Ivl=16ms
> > I:  If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=0e(video) Sub=02 Prot=01
> > Driver=uvcvideo
> > I:  If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=0e(video) Sub=01 Prot=01
> > Driver=uvcvideo
> > E:  Ad=85(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  16 Ivl=16ms
> > I:  If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=0e(video) Sub=02 Prot=01
> > Driver=uvcvideo
> > I:  If#= 4 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=03(HID  ) Sub=00 Prot=00
> > Driver=usbhid
> > E:  Ad=84(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  64 Ivl=16ms
> > I:  If#= 5 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=fe(app. ) Sub=01 Prot=01
> > Driver=(none)
> > 
> > v2. add fixes tag and the device info
> These change description goes below "---" line.
> 
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
> 
> > 
> > Fixes: bba6d9e47f3e ("iio: hid-sensor-attributes: Fix sensor
> > property
> > setting failure.")
> > Signed-off-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@...onical.com>
> > ---
> >  .../hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c       | 23 +++++++++++----
> > --
> > --
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
> > b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
> > index ad1882f608c0..b7ffd97e6c56 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
> > @@ -564,8 +564,21 @@ int hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(struct
> > hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
> >  	} else
> >  		st->timestamp_ns_scale = 1000000000;
> >  
> > +	ret = 0;
> > +	if (st->sensitivity.index < 0 || st->sensitivity_rel.index
> > <
> > 0) {
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	hid_sensor_get_report_latency_info(hsdev, usage_id, st);
> >  
> > +	ret = sensor_hub_get_feature(hsdev,
> > +				st->power_state.report_id,
> > +				st->power_state.index,
> > sizeof(value), &value);
> > +	if (value < 0)
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +out:
> >  	hid_dbg(hsdev->hdev, "common attributes: %x:%x, %x:%x,
> > %x:%x
> > %x:%x %x:%x\n",
> >  		st->poll.index, st->poll.report_id,
> >  		st->report_state.index, st-
> > >report_state.report_id,
> > @@ -573,15 +586,7 @@ int hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(struct
> > hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
> >  		st->sensitivity.index, st->sensitivity.report_id,
> >  		timestamp.index, timestamp.report_id);
> >  
> > -	ret = sensor_hub_get_feature(hsdev,
> > -				st->power_state.report_id,
> > -				st->power_state.index,
> > sizeof(value), &value);
> > -	if (ret < 0)
> > -		return ret;
> > -	if (value < 0)
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > -	return 0;
> > +	return ret;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes, "IIO_HID");
> >  
>