linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: convert stm32 rcc bindings to json-schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <581275bf-11f3-4a8a-8e58-75b00c515c79@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 11:13:38 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: convert stm32 rcc bindings to
 json-schema

On 14/01/2025 11:00, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 10:48 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 14/01/2025 10:36, Dario Binacchi wrote:
>>>> Nothing improved here.
>>>
>>> In my humble opinion, there is nothing to improve. Any modification
>>> made causes the tests to fail.
>>>
>>> $ git grep st,stm32f746-rcc arch/
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f746.dtsi:                    compatible =
>>> "st,stm32f746-rcc", "st,stm32-rcc";
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f769-disco.dts:       compatible =
>>> "st,stm32f769-rcc", "st,stm32f746-rcc", "st,stm32-rcc";
>>>
>>> Or am I missing something?
>>
>> How can I know what you are missing if you do not show the code?
> 
> Sorry, but I still can't understand. I run multiple tests, trying to

You don't understand that I cannot improve your code if I do not see the
code? So let me rephrase: In order to tell what is wrong with some sort
of code, I need to see it. I cannot tell what is wrong with code without
seeing it.

> modify things
> based on what I understood of your suggestions, but the tests failed
> every time.
> 
> Could you kindly provide an example of what you'd like me to do?
Any qcom binding? Any other SoC binding with multiple devices?

Best regards,
Krzysztof