lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABGWkvrYUU=HAh4uYNpZSpzeyanfp5a_xjK_178ftQyDKH=cTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 11:00:09 +0100
From: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, 
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, 
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: convert stm32 rcc bindings to json-schema

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 10:48 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 14/01/2025 10:36, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> >> Nothing improved here.
> >
> > In my humble opinion, there is nothing to improve. Any modification
> > made causes the tests to fail.
> >
> > $ git grep st,stm32f746-rcc arch/
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f746.dtsi:                    compatible =
> > "st,stm32f746-rcc", "st,stm32-rcc";
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f769-disco.dts:       compatible =
> > "st,stm32f769-rcc", "st,stm32f746-rcc", "st,stm32-rcc";
> >
> > Or am I missing something?
>
> How can I know what you are missing if you do not show the code?

Sorry, but I still can't understand. I run multiple tests, trying to
modify things
based on what I understood of your suggestions, but the tests failed
every time.

Could you kindly provide an example of what you'd like me to do?

Thanks and regards,
Dario
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof



-- 

Dario Binacchi

Senior Embedded Linux Developer

dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com

__________________________________


Amarula Solutions SRL

Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT

T. +39 042 243 5310
info@...rulasolutions.com

www.amarulasolutions.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ