[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250114212902.2bb6381e@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 21:29:02 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Anil S Keshavamurthy
<anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Oleg Nesterov
<oleg@...hat.com>, Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@...il.com>, Naveen N Rao
<naveen@...nel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Jason Baron
<jbaron@...mai.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] tracing: Adopt __free() and guard() for
trace_fprobe.c
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 23:30:22 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>
> Adopt __free() and guard() for trace_fprobe.c to remove gotos.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
> - Rename trace_fprobe_create* functions.
> - Rename __free label for trace_fprobe.
> - Simplify the last part of trace_fprobe_create_internal().
> ---
This conflicts with the changes in my tree. The ones that I pulled in from
you that makes fprobes use function graph.
Care to rebase this patch on top of my ftrace/for-next branch?
Then we don't need to worry about the conflicts.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists