[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87msfsatyb.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:05:32 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Darren
Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
André
Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>, kernel list
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
io-uring <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: futex+io_uring: futex_q::task can maybe be dangling (but is not
actually accessed, so it's fine)
On Wed, Jan 15 2025 at 08:32, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Here's the raw patch. Should've done this initially rather than just
> tackle __futex_queue(), for some reason I thought/assumed that
> futex_queue() was more widely used.
'git grep' is pretty useful to validate such assumptions :)
> What do you think?
Looks about right.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists