linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 17/19] media: dt-bindings: ti,ds90ub960: Add "i2c-addr" link property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b083ab17-a34e-42cf-9696-ff774731dc58@ideasonboard.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 19:19:10 +0200
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>,
 Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>,
 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] media: dt-bindings: ti,ds90ub960: Add "i2c-addr"
 link property

Hi,

On 15/01/2025 10:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

>>> Why only these folks? Why not all of the maintainers?
>>
>> The whole series is sent to the media list and maintainers. I thought
>> this single patch doesn't warrant sending the whole series to DT list
>> and maintainers, so I cc'd them here.
> 
> 
> I was wondering why only some of the DT maintainers, not all? My usual
> assumption is: you are not using get_maintainers.pl or you are working
> on an old kernel.

It's simpler than that: a copy-paste mistake. I'm not sure how I managed 
to miss Conor there.

Any preference on cc'ing the DT maintainers and the dt-list only for 
this patch (I'll use --- this time, I promise!), or just sending the 
whole series also to DT people?

  Tomi