linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 17/19] media: dt-bindings: ti,ds90ub960: Add "i2c-addr" link property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a869e66e-4fb0-49b6-9307-9a20c73cb374@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 21:25:46 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>,
 Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>,
 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] media: dt-bindings: ti,ds90ub960: Add "i2c-addr"
 link property

On 15/01/2025 18:19, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 15/01/2025 10:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
>>>> Why only these folks? Why not all of the maintainers?
>>>
>>> The whole series is sent to the media list and maintainers. I thought
>>> this single patch doesn't warrant sending the whole series to DT list
>>> and maintainers, so I cc'd them here.
>>
>>
>> I was wondering why only some of the DT maintainers, not all? My usual
>> assumption is: you are not using get_maintainers.pl or you are working
>> on an old kernel.
> 
> It's simpler than that: a copy-paste mistake. I'm not sure how I managed 
> to miss Conor there.
> 
> Any preference on cc'ing the DT maintainers and the dt-list only for 
> this patch (I'll use --- this time, I promise!), or just sending the 
> whole series also to DT people?
I think only Rob uses DT list entirely. I use both - DT list and being
directly CC-ed on emails, and I think Conor relies on being Cc-ed
directly. IOW, just cc all maintainers + DT list. Unless you touch
multiple subsystems, there is rarely a point to strip get_maintainers.pl
output from maintainers/reviewers/submitters. Do not confuse in skipping
non-maintainers pointed by Git-fallback (not applicable to b4, I think),
because these should be used carefully.

Best regards,
Krzysztof