[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250115230430.GA560547@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:04:30 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@....com>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: dwc: dra7xx: Use
syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Use syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args() which is a wrapper over
> syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() combined with getting the syscon
> argument. Except simpler code this annotates within one line that given
> phandle has arguments, so grepping for code would be easier.
>
> There is also no real benefit in printing errors on missing syscon
> argument, because this is done just too late: runtime check on
> static/build-time data. Dtschema and Devicetree bindings offer the
> static/build-time check for this already.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 27 ++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> index 5c62e1a3ba52919afe96fbcbc6edaf70775a69cb..33d6bf460ffe5bb724a061558dd93ec7bdadc336 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> @@ -635,30 +635,20 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_unaligned_memaccess(struct device *dev)
> {
> int ret;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> - struct of_phandle_args args;
> + unsigned int args[2];
> struct regmap *regmap;
>
> - regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np,
> - "ti,syscon-unaligned-access");
> + regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args(np, "ti,syscon-unaligned-access",
> + 2, args);
> if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "can't get ti,syscon-unaligned-access\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(np, "ti,syscon-unaligned-access",
> - 2, 0, &args);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to parse ti,syscon-unaligned-access\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, args.args[0], args.args[1],
> - args.args[1]);
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, args[0], args[1], args[1]);
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "failed to enable unaligned access\n");
>
> - of_node_put(args.np);
> -
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -671,18 +661,13 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_configure_two_lane(struct device *dev,
> u32 mask;
> u32 val;
>
> - pcie_syscon = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "ti,syscon-lane-sel");
> + pcie_syscon = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args(np, "ti,syscon-lane-sel",
> + 1, &pcie_reg);
> if (IS_ERR(pcie_syscon)) {
> dev_err(dev, "unable to get ti,syscon-lane-sel\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (of_property_read_u32_index(np, "ti,syscon-lane-sel", 1,
> - &pcie_reg)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "couldn't get lane selection reg offset\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
Wow. I believe you that syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args() is
equivalent to both:
- syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() followed by
of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(), and
- syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() followed by
of_property_read_u32_index()
but I can't say it's obvious to this syscon- and OF-naive reviewer,
even after tracing a few layers in :)
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists