[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3b4dcf9-7055-33f9-396c-c90b8cfa68d6@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:53:53 +0800
From: yukaixiong <yukaixiong@...wei.com>
To: Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
<ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, <dalias@...c.org>,
<glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, <luto@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <brauner@...nel.org>,
<jack@...e.cz>, <kees@...nel.org>, <j.granados@...sung.com>,
<willy@...radead.org>, <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, <vbabka@...e.cz>,
<lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, <trondmy@...nel.org>, <anna@...nel.org>,
<chuck.lever@...cle.com>, <jlayton@...nel.org>, <neilb@...e.de>,
<okorniev@...hat.com>, <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, <tom@...pey.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <paul@...l-moore.com>, <jmorris@...ei.org>,
<linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, <dhowells@...hat.com>,
<haifeng.xu@...pee.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, <dchinner@...hat.com>, <bfoster@...hat.com>,
<souravpanda@...gle.com>, <hannes@...xchg.org>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
<pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, <david@...hat.com>, <ryan.roberts@....com>,
<ying.huang@...el.com>, <yang@...amperecomputing.com>,
<zev@...ilderbeest.net>, <serge@...lyn.com>, <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 -next 00/16] sysctl: move sysctls from vm_table into
its own files
On 2025/1/14 21:50, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 03:07:35PM +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote:
>> This patch series moves sysctls of vm_table in kernel/sysctl.c to
>> places where they actually belong, and do some related code clean-ups.
>> After this patch series, all sysctls in vm_table have been moved into its
>> own files, meanwhile, delete vm_table.
>>
>> All the modifications of this patch series base on
>> linux-next(tags/next-20250110). To test this patch series, the code was
>> compiled with both the CONFIG_SYSCTL enabled and disabled on arm64 and
>> x86_64 architectures. After this patch series is applied, all files
>> under /proc/sys/vm can be read or written normally.
> It is looking good! Here is how I think we should move it upstream:
>
> 1. These should queued in for 6.15 instead of the next merge window.
> It is too late in the current cycle and if we put it in now, it will
> not properly tested in linux-next.
>
> 2. I am putting this in sysctl-testing with the expectation of pushing this
> up for the 6.15 merge window. Please tell me if you want this to go
> through some other tree.
>
> Thx for the contribution
>
> Best
Thank you! I don't want this to go through some other tree.
Best ...
>> my test steps as below listed:
>>
>> Step 1: Set CONFIG_SYSCTL to 'n' and compile the Linux kernel on the
>> arm64 architecture. The kernel compiles successfully without any errors
>> or warnings.
>>
> ...
>> mm/swap.c | 16 ++-
>> mm/swap.h | 1 +
>> mm/util.c | 67 +++++++--
>> mm/vmscan.c | 23 +++
>> mm/vmstat.c | 44 +++++-
>> net/sunrpc/auth.c | 2 +-
>> security/min_addr.c | 11 ++
>> 23 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 312 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists