[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wmewe7zc.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:34:15 +0100
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
To: "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Matthew Wilcox"
<willy@...radead.org>, "Lorenzo Stoakes" <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@...e.cz>, "John Hubbard"
<jhubbard@...dia.com>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>, "Jann Horn"
<jannh@...gle.com>, "Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@...gle.com>, "Alex
Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/8] mm: rust: add lock_vma_under_rcu
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 3:50 PM Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com> writes:
>>
>> > Currently, the binder driver always uses the mmap lock to make changes
>> > to its vma. Because the mmap lock is global to the process, this can
>> > involve significant contention. However, the kernel has a feature called
>> > per-vma locks, which can significantly reduce contention. For example,
>> > you can take a vma lock in parallel with an mmap write lock. This is
>> > important because contention on the mmap lock has been a long-term
>> > recurring challenge for the Binder driver.
>> >
>> > This patch introduces support for using `lock_vma_under_rcu` from Rust.
>> > The Rust Binder driver will be able to use this to reduce contention on
>> > the mmap lock.
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> (for mm bits)
>> > Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
>> > ---
>> > rust/helpers/mm.c | 5 +++++
>> > rust/kernel/mm.rs | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/rust/helpers/mm.c b/rust/helpers/mm.c
>> > index 7b72eb065a3e..81b510c96fd2 100644
>> > --- a/rust/helpers/mm.c
>> > +++ b/rust/helpers/mm.c
>> > @@ -43,3 +43,8 @@ struct vm_area_struct *rust_helper_vma_lookup(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> > {
>> > return vma_lookup(mm, addr);
>> > }
>> > +
>> > +void rust_helper_vma_end_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> > +{
>> > + vma_end_read(vma);
>> > +}
>> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/mm.rs b/rust/kernel/mm.rs
>> > index ace8e7d57afe..425b73a9dfe6 100644
>> > --- a/rust/kernel/mm.rs
>> > +++ b/rust/kernel/mm.rs
>> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>> > use core::{ops::Deref, ptr::NonNull};
>> >
>> > pub mod virt;
>> > +use virt::VmAreaRef;
>> >
>> > /// A wrapper for the kernel's `struct mm_struct`.
>> > ///
>> > @@ -170,6 +171,32 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw<'a>(ptr: *const bindings::mm_struct) -> &'a MmWithUser {
>> > unsafe { &*ptr.cast() }
>> > }
>> >
>> > + /// Attempt to access a vma using the vma read lock.
>> > + ///
>> > + /// This is an optimistic trylock operation, so it may fail if there is contention. In that
>> > + /// case, you should fall back to taking the mmap read lock.
>> > + ///
>> > + /// When per-vma locks are disabled, this always returns `None`.
>> > + #[inline]
>> > + pub fn lock_vma_under_rcu(&self, vma_addr: usize) -> Option<VmaReadGuard<'_>> {
>> > + #[cfg(CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK)]
>> > + {
>> > + // SAFETY: Calling `bindings::lock_vma_under_rcu` is always okay given an mm where
>> > + // `mm_users` is non-zero.
>> > + let vma = unsafe { bindings::lock_vma_under_rcu(self.as_raw(), vma_addr as _) };
>>
>> Is `as _` the right approach here?
>
> We can drop it once the FFI integer types are fixed. It's late in the
> cycle, so this patch probably won't make it for 6.14. This means I can
> remove the casts entirely before this is merged. Otherwise we can
> remove them in a follow-up.
Sounds good to me 👍
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists