linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] seqlock: add missing parameter documentation for raw_seqcount_try

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250116140320.6620b0b28dfd8f7ab435dec3@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 14:03:20 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
 peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
 boqun.feng@...il.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, david@...hat.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] seqlock: add missing parameter documentation for
 raw_seqcount_try_begin()

On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 14:28:26 -0500 Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com> wrote:

> >
> > base-commit: 4637fa5d47a49c977116321cc575ea22215df22d
> 
> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> 
> The tip tree also has the "seqlock: add raw_seqcount_try_begin" commit 
> with a different hash - 96450ead1652.

Yup, thanks.  An awkward dependency thing.  It'll sort itself out
during the merge window.

Now I'm wondering why we didn't just put that very simple patch straight
into mainline then be happy.  Oh well.