[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173713648943.2190713.18158908440161125480.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:54:49 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] perf test: Add a runs-per-test option
On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 20:57:31 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Add a runs-per-test option to perf test inorder to better diagnose
> flakes. Each runs executes as if it were a different test, the tests
> appear together in the output:
>
> ```
> $ perf test -r 3 lbr -v
> 122: perf record LBR tests : Ok
> 122: perf record LBR tests : Ok
> 122: perf record LBR tests : Ok
> ```
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists