[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250117220955.2482817-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:09:55 +0000
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid trying to get invalid block address
In f2fs_new_inode(), if we fail to get a new inode, we go iput(), followed by
f2fs_evict_inode(). If the inode is not marked as bad, it'll try to call
f2fs_remove_inode_page() which tries to read the inode block given node id.
But, there's no block address allocated yet, which gives a chance to access
a wrong block address, if the block device has some garbage data in NAT table.
We need to make sure NAT table should have zero data for all the unallocated
node ids, but also would be better to take this unnecessary path as well.
Let's mark the faild inode as bad.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/namei.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
index 57d46e1439de..a278c7da8177 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
@@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ static struct inode *f2fs_new_inode(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
trace_f2fs_new_inode(inode, err);
dquot_drop(inode);
inode->i_flags |= S_NOQUOTA;
+ make_bad_inode(inode);
if (nid_free)
set_inode_flag(inode, FI_FREE_NID);
clear_nlink(inode);
--
2.48.0.rc2.279.g1de40edade-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists