[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250117234204.2600624-6-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 15:42:03 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: selftests: Print out the actual Top-Down Slots count
on failure
Print out the expected vs. actual count of the Top-Down Slots event on
failure in the Intel PMU counters test. GUEST_ASSERT() only expands
constants/macros, i.e. only prints the value of the expected count, which
makes it difficult to debug and triage failures.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c
index ea1485a08c78..8aaaf25b6111 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c
@@ -174,7 +174,9 @@ static void guest_assert_event_count(uint8_t idx, uint32_t pmc, uint32_t pmc_msr
GUEST_ASSERT_NE(count, 0);
break;
case INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_SLOTS_INDEX:
- GUEST_ASSERT(count >= NUM_INSNS_RETIRED);
+ __GUEST_ASSERT(count >= NUM_INSNS_RETIRED,
+ "Expected top-down slots >= %u, got count = %lu",
+ NUM_INSNS_RETIRED, count);
break;
default:
break;
--
2.48.0.rc2.279.g1de40edade-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists