[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3712d97e-8a2d-47fb-8f95-a9153c71dab3@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:32:00 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
Cc: heiko@...ech.de, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: rockchip: power-domain: add power domain
support for rk3562
On 16/01/2025 15:46, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> static const struct rockchip_pmu_info rk3568_pmu = {
>> .pwr_offset = 0xa0,
>> .status_offset = 0x98,
>> @@ -1429,6 +1471,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match[] = {
>> .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-power-controller",
>> .data = (void *)&rk3399_pmu,
>> },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk3562-power-controller",
>
> I couldn't find the corresponding DT patch where this compatible is
> being documented. Can you please re-send and keep me posted for both
> the DT and pmdomain patch?
I already commented on this on 1st patch - the split of original
patchset is entirely broken and actual binding is missing. Or not
missing but sent to entirely different folks in different thread...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists