[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z4r-Znz1GQ2E1vMX@google.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 17:05:42 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, yan.y.zhao@...el.com,
isaku.yamahata@...el.com, binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/18] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Extract root invalid check
from tdx_mmu_next_root()
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
>
> Extract tdp_mmu_root_match() to check if the root has given types and use
> it for the root page table iterator. It checks only_invalid now.
>
> TDX KVM operates on a shared page table only (Shared-EPT), a mirrored page
> table only (Secure-EPT), or both based on the operation. KVM MMU notifier
> operations only on shared page table. KVM guest_memfd invalidation
> operations only on mirrored page table, and so on. Introduce a centralized
> matching function instead of open coding matching logic in the iterator.
> The next step is to extend the function to check whether the page is shared
> or private
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/ZivazWQw1oCU8VBC@google.com/
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> Message-ID: <20240718211230.1492011-10-rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 5b01038ddce8..e0ccfdd4200b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root)
> call_rcu(&root->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
> }
>
> +static bool tdp_mmu_root_match(struct kvm_mmu_page *root, bool only_valid)
> +{
> + if (only_valid && root->role.invalid)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
Ugh, this is almost as bad as
if (x)
return true;
return false;
Just do
return !only_valid || root->role.invalid;
And I vote to drop the helper, "match" makes me think about things like roles
and addresses, not just if a root is valid.
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Returns the next root after @prev_root (or the first root if @prev_root is
> * NULL). A reference to the returned root is acquired, and the reference to
> @@ -125,7 +133,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
> typeof(*next_root), link);
>
> while (next_root) {
> - if ((!only_valid || !next_root->role.invalid) &&
> + if (tdp_mmu_root_match(next_root, only_valid) &&
E.g. this can just as easily be
!only_valid || root->role.invalid &&
which is amusingly even fewer characters :-D
> kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(next_root))
> break;
>
> @@ -176,7 +184,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
> list_for_each_entry(_root, &_kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link) \
> if (kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(_kvm, false) && \
> ((_as_id >= 0 && kvm_mmu_page_as_id(_root) != _as_id) || \
> - ((_only_valid) && (_root)->role.invalid))) { \
> + !tdp_mmu_root_match((_root), (_only_valid)))) { \
> } else
>
> #define for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id) \
> --
> 2.43.5
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists