[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173739761304.3950752.5970208244862437457.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 10:26:53 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw>,
Chun-Ying Huang <chuang@...nycu.edu.tw>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf bench: Fix undefined behavior in cmpworker()
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:08:42 +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> The comparison function cmpworker() violates the C standard's
> requirements for qsort() comparison functions, which mandate symmetry
> and transitivity:
>
> Symmetry: If x < y, then y > x.
> Transitivity: If x < y and y < z, then x < z.
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists