[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276F3057E4F8DFA3F22E3C48CE72@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 05:44:27 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, "jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH rc] iommufd: Explicitize struct iommu_hwpt_pgfault padding
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2025 10:37 AM
>
> @@ -868,6 +868,7 @@ enum iommu_hwpt_pgfault_perm {
> * @pasid: Process Address Space ID
> * @grpid: Page Request Group Index
> * @perm: Combination of enum iommu_hwpt_pgfault_perm
> + * @__reserved: Must be 0.
iommufd_fault_fops_read() doesn't follow this statement as
hwpt_fault is on stack with that field uninitialized.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists