[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250121061418.2eiifftsv6q7jxlm@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 11:44:18 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, zhanjie9@...ilicon.com,
lihuisong@...wei.com, fanghao11@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] cpufreq: ACPI: Remove set_boost in
acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init()
On 17-01-25, 18:14, Lifeng Zheng wrote:
> At the end of cpufreq_online() in cpufreq.c, set_boost is executed and the
> per-policy boost flag is set to mirror the cpufreq_driver boost. So it is
> not necessary to run set_boost in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index c9ebacf5c88e..f4b5e455f173 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -891,11 +891,6 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> if (perf->states[0].core_frequency * 1000 != freq_table[0].frequency)
> pr_warn(FW_WARN "P-state 0 is not max freq\n");
>
> - if (acpi_cpufreq_driver.set_boost) {
> - set_boost(policy, acpi_cpufreq_driver.boost_enabled);
> - policy->boost_enabled = acpi_cpufreq_driver.boost_enabled;
> - }
> -
> return result;
>
> err_unreg:
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
There are more cleanups in drivers that can be done though. I will try
that once this series is merged.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists