linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] cpufreq: Introduce a more generic way to set default per-policy boost flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250121042024.pstn2otfqnnajgxl@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:50:24 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "zhenglifeng (A)" <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
	jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, zhanjie9@...ilicon.com,
	lihuisong@...wei.com, fanghao11@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] cpufreq: Introduce a more generic way to set
 default per-policy boost flag

On 21-01-25, 09:45, zhenglifeng (A) wrote:
> On 2025/1/20 17:01, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 17-01-25, 18:14, Lifeng Zheng wrote:
> >> +	/* Let the per-policy boost flag mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during init */
> >> +	if (policy->boost_enabled != cpufreq_boost_enabled()) {
> >> +		policy->boost_enabled = cpufreq_boost_enabled();
> >> +		ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, policy->boost_enabled);
> > 
> > I though you agreed to do some optimization here ?
> 
> Sorry. Do I miss something here?

https://lore.kernel.org/all/17c7ed77-21f1-4093-91fc-f3eaa863d312@huawei.com/

-- 
viresh