[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8de49f2c161085fdc63d8cc883cdebd3451df47f.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:03:25 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de, peterz@...radead.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
nadav.amit@...il.com, thomas.lendacky@....com, kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jannh@...gle.com,
mhklinux@...look.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/12] x86/mm: remove pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table call
On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 20:47 +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.01.25 03:40, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Every pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table call ends up calling
> > tlb_remove_table.
> >
>
> Indeed, but the !CONFIG_PARAVIRT variant paravirt_tlb_remove_table()
> however calls tlb_remove_page().
Patch 1/12 from this series removes that.
After patch 1/12, we always call tlb_remove_table everywhere.
--
All Rights Reversed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists