[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z4-9rSwR3L9t7bHp@pluto>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 15:31:04 +0000
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] firmware: scmi/imx: Add i.MX95 LMM/CPU Protocol
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:08:10PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> i.MX95 System Manager(SM) implements Logical Machine Management(LMM) and
> CPU protocol to manage Logical Machine(LM) and CPUs(eg, M7).
>
> To manage M7 in a separate LM or in same LM as Linux itself. LMM APIs
> and CPU APIs are needed.
>
Hi Peng,
I see that you are really starting to like vendor extensions
capabilities :P ... jokes apart I'll have a deeper look at this in the
next days (togetehr with your other pending patches...), BUT in the
meantime a quick one...where are the bindings for these additional
vendor protocols...seems like a patch is missing to add those in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/nxp,imx95-scmi.yaml
...even if bare simple protocol numbers (like existing protocol@81)
currently these are needed for the protocol to be initialized by the
core.
Thanks,
Cristian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists