linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/5] firmware: scmi/imx: Add i.MX95 LMM/CPU Protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <PAXPR04MB84591FF19A3CA8D37F2D97CD88E12@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 05:31:20 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
	<peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team
	<kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org" <arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev"
	<imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] firmware: scmi/imx: Add i.MX95 LMM/CPU Protocol

Hi Cristian,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] firmware: scmi/imx: Add i.MX95 LMM/CPU
> Protocol
> 
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:08:10PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > i.MX95 System Manager(SM) implements Logical Machine
> Management(LMM)
> > and CPU protocol to manage Logical Machine(LM) and CPUs(eg, M7).
> >
> > To manage M7 in a separate LM or in same LM as Linux itself. LMM
> APIs
> > and CPU APIs are needed.
> >
> 
> Hi Peng,
> 
> I see that you are really starting to like vendor extensions
> capabilities :P ... jokes apart

I not like vendor extensions (:

 I'll have a deeper look at this in the next
> days (togetehr with your other pending patches...),

Thanks for helping reviewing patches.

 BUT in the
> meantime a quick one...where are the bindings for these additional
> vendor protocols...seems like a patch is missing to add those in
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/nxp,imx95-scmi.yaml
> 
> ...even if bare simple protocol numbers (like existing protocol@81)
> currently these are needed for the protocol to be initialized by the core.

I missed that. Thanks for pointing out. I will include the binding in V2.
V2 will be post out later after collecting some comments on V1.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Thanks,
> Cristian