[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3c57c62-f5f7-4b80-aa8f-d6edefbb5493@omp.ru>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 21:33:15 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Paul Barker
<paul.barker.ct@...renesas.com>, Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David
S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Mikhail Ulyanov
<mikhail.ulyanov@...entembedded.com>
CC: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: ravb: Fix missing rtnl lock in suspend path
Hello!
My Cogent Embedded tenure is long over, so I dropped my old email... :-)
On 1/22/25 7:19 PM, Kory Maincent wrote:
> Fix the suspend path by ensuring the rtnl lock is held where required.
Maybe suspend/resume path (the same w/the subject)?
> Calls to ravb_open, ravb_close and wol operations must be performed under
> the rtnl lock to prevent conflicts with ongoing ndo operations.
[...]
> Reported-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/4c6419d8-c06b-495c-b987-d66c2e1ff848@tuxon.dev/
> Fixes: 0184165b2f42 ("ravb: add sleep PM suspend/resume support")
> Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index bc395294a32d..2c6d8e4966c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
[...]
> @@ -3245,19 +3250,25 @@ static int ravb_resume(struct device *dev)
> if (!netif_running(ndev))
> return 0;
>
> + rtnl_lock();
> /* If WoL is enabled restore the interface. */
> if (priv->wol_enabled) {
> ret = ravb_wol_restore(ndev);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + rtnl_unlock();
> return ret;
> + }
> } else {
> ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + rtnl_unlock();
> return ret;
Hm, are you sure we need to have rtnl_lock around pm_runtime_force_resume() too?
[...]
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists