linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/127] 5.15.177-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <91a444a4-a187-4e78-9be7-4199368b2a7b@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:38:46 +0530
From: Vijayendra Suman <vijayendra.suman@...cle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
        rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com,
        broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/127] 5.15.177-rc1 review

Hello,

On 21/01/25 11:21 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.177 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 23 Jan 2025 17:45:02 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/ 
> patch-5.15.177-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
No Problem seen on x86_64 and aarch64 platforms with our testing.

Tested-by: Vijayendra Suman <vijayendra.suman@...cle.com>

thanks,
Vijay