linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings:Add SQ52206 to ina2xx devicetree bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250123075802.1105859-1-wenliang202407@163.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:02 +0800
From: Wenliang Yan <wenliang202407@....com>
To: linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: conor+dt@...nel.org,
	corbet@....net,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	jdelvare@...e.com,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	krzk@...nel.org,
	linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	robh@...nel.org,
	wenliang202407@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings:Add SQ52206 to ina2xx devicetree bindings

At 2025-01-23 11:30:59, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>On 1/22/25 17:36, Wenliang Yan wrote:
>> At 2025-01-22 15:59:02, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:29:39AM +0800, Wenliang Yan wrote:
>>>> Add the sq52206 compatible to the ina2xx.yaml
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wenliang Yan <wenliang202407@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Add the meaning of 'shunt-gain' in SQ52206.
>>>
>>> You already sent v3... and you got comment from me. You ignored both
>>> Conor and me, so me doing third time the same and expecting different
>>> results would be definition of insanity.
>>>
>>> Please read carefully submitting patches before posting new version.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>> 
>> Sorry, I have received your comment and 'acked'. I was originally
>> planning to resend [PATCH v3 2/2], because I have not received a
>> response from Guenter Roeck<linux@...ck-us.net>. However, I forgot to
>> add 'RESEND' in the title. Thank you for your patient reply.
>> I apologize again.
>> 
>
>A resend after just four days, plus dropping all Acks ? Are you serious ?
>
>Please keep in mind that not all of us are getting paid for doing this.
>If I am otherwise busy, it will take longer. Sometimes it will take
>much longer. If you resend a patches, they will end up at the tail
>of my review queue. If you drop Acks, expect me to dig it all up,
>and figure out on my own what if anything changed, the patches will
>end up even further down, as in "I'll look into this series if I have
>nothing else left to review".
>
>Guenter

Sorry for the inconvenience caused by my actions. I am just concerned that
you did not receive the email, and I will continue to wait for your review
and correction.

Best regards,
Wenliang Yan