linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings:Add SQ52206 to ina2xx devicetree bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9cc5cc32-9e21-4b95-9f00-a15d690c6d57@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 09:47:53 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Wenliang Yan <wenliang202407@....com>, linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: conor+dt@...nel.org, corbet@....net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 jdelvare@...e.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings:Add SQ52206 to ina2xx devicetree
 bindings

On 23/01/2025 08:58, Wenliang Yan wrote:
> At 2025-01-23 11:30:59, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>> On 1/22/25 17:36, Wenliang Yan wrote:
>>> At 2025-01-22 15:59:02, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:29:39AM +0800, Wenliang Yan wrote:
>>>>> Add the sq52206 compatible to the ina2xx.yaml
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wenliang Yan <wenliang202407@....com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Add the meaning of 'shunt-gain' in SQ52206.
>>>>
>>>> You already sent v3... and you got comment from me. You ignored both
>>>> Conor and me, so me doing third time the same and expecting different
>>>> results would be definition of insanity.
>>>>
>>>> Please read carefully submitting patches before posting new version.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>> Sorry, I have received your comment and 'acked'. I was originally
>>> planning to resend [PATCH v3 2/2], because I have not received a
>>> response from Guenter Roeck<linux@...ck-us.net>. However, I forgot to
>>> add 'RESEND' in the title. Thank you for your patient reply.
>>> I apologize again.
>>>
>>
>> A resend after just four days, plus dropping all Acks ? Are you serious ?
>>
>> Please keep in mind that not all of us are getting paid for doing this.
>> If I am otherwise busy, it will take longer. Sometimes it will take
>> much longer. If you resend a patches, they will end up at the tail
>> of my review queue. If you drop Acks, expect me to dig it all up,
>> and figure out on my own what if anything changed, the patches will
>> end up even further down, as in "I'll look into this series if I have
>> nothing else left to review".
>>
>> Guenter
> 
> Sorry for the inconvenience caused by my actions. I am just concerned that
> you did not receive the email, and I will continue to wait for your review
> and correction.
What review? I am telling you that you ignored us twice and I am not
doing the same third time expecting different results.

How did you respond to this:

"Please read carefully submitting patches before posting new version."

?

How did you respond to previous acks?

Best regards,
Krzysztof