[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc63c005a8f2fd6a34a055c1ac484bc36869f8a8.camel@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:24:37 +0000
From: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
To: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "liuhangbin@...il.com"
<liuhangbin@...il.com>
CC: "andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "razor@...ckwall.org"
<razor@...ckwall.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "liali@...hat.com" <liali@...hat.com>,
"jv@...sburgh.net" <jv@...sburgh.net>, "pabeni@...hat.com"
<pabeni@...hat.com>, "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Boris Pismenny
<borisp@...dia.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>, "kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] Bonding: Fix support for gso_partial_features
I've sent another patch to suggest these changes.
I've tested it (with iperf3 traffic) and by playing with ethtool -K on
the bond device. With simple iperf3 TCP traffic and no other tweaks, I
get 2x the performance over the bond device with my patch compared to
without.
I hope I didn't miss anything...
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250123150909.387415-1-cratiu@nvidia.com/T/#u
Cosmin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists