[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z5JegF7i3Ig2pLYB@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 10:21:36 -0500
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] PCI: dwc: Use devicetree 'ranges' property to get
rid of cpu_addr_fixup() callback
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 10:42:37AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:29:16PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:14:00PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 02:44:20PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > parent_bus_addr in struct of_range can indicate address information just
> > > > ahead of PCIe controller. Most system's bus fabric use 1:1 map between
> > > > input and output address. but some hardware like i.MX8QXP doesn't use 1:1
> > > > map. See below diagram:
> > > >
> > > > ┌─────────┐ ┌────────────┐
> > > > ┌─────┐ │ │ IA: 0x8ff8_0000 │ │
> > > > │ CPU ├───►│ ┌────►├─────────────────┐ │ PCI │
> > > > └─────┘ │ │ │ IA: 0x8ff0_0000 │ │ │
> > > > CPU Addr │ │ ┌─►├─────────────┐ │ │ Controller │
> > > > 0x7ff8_0000─┼───┘ │ │ │ │ │ │
> > > > │ │ │ │ │ │ │ PCI Addr
> > > > 0x7ff0_0000─┼──────┘ │ │ └──► IOSpace ─┼────────────►
> > > > │ │ │ │ │ 0
> > > > 0x7000_0000─┼────────►├─────────┐ │ │ │
> > > > └─────────┘ │ └──────► CfgSpace ─┼────────────►
> > > > BUS Fabric │ │ │ 0
> > > > │ │ │
> > > > └──────────► MemSpace ─┼────────────►
> > > > IA: 0x8000_0000 │ │ 0x8000_0000
> > > > └────────────┘
> > > >
> > > > bus@...00000 {
> > > > compatible = "simple-bus";
> > > > #address-cells = <1>;
> > > > #size-cells = <1>;
> > > > ranges = <0x80000000 0x0 0x70000000 0x10000000>;
> > > >
> > > > pcie@...10000 {
> > > > compatible = "fsl,imx8q-pcie";
> > > > reg = <0x5f010000 0x10000>, <0x8ff00000 0x80000>;
> > > > reg-names = "dbi", "config";
> > > > #address-cells = <3>;
> > > > #size-cells = <2>;
> > > > device_type = "pci";
> > > > bus-range = <0x00 0xff>;
> > > > ranges = <0x81000000 0 0x00000000 0x8ff80000 0 0x00010000>,
> > > > <0x82000000 0 0x80000000 0x80000000 0 0x0ff00000>;
> > > > ...
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > Term internal address (IA) here means the address just before PCIe
> > > > controller. After ATU use this IA instead CPU address, cpu_addr_fixup() can
> > > > be removed.
> > >
> > > > @@ -730,9 +779,15 @@ static int dw_pcie_iatu_setup(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> > > >
> > > > atu.index = i;
> > > > atu.type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM;
> > > > - atu.cpu_addr = entry->res->start;
> > > > + parent_bus_addr = entry->res->start;
> > > > atu.pci_addr = entry->res->start - entry->offset;
> > > >
> > > > + ret = dw_pcie_get_parent_addr(pci, entry->res->start, &parent_bus_addr);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + atu.cpu_addr = parent_bus_addr;
> > >
> > > Here you set atu.cpu_addr to the intermediate bus address instead
> > > of the CPU physical address before calling
> > > dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu().
> > >
> > > But what about other callers of dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu()? Don't
> > > all of them need to use the intermediate bus address?
>
> All should use "intermediate bus address", RC side only call it here. EP
>
> side is here
> https://lore.kernel.org/imx/Z4p0fUAK1ONNjLst@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810/T/#t
>
> >
> > Somehow I expected the patch to skip calling ->cpu_addr_fixup() if the
> > driver had set 'use_parent_dt_ranges'. In fact, I think that's a
> > requirement.
>
> It's fine to add check to call cpu_addr_fixup() although I think driver
> owner should take responsiblity to make cpu_addr_fixup and
> use_parent_dt_ranges exclusive.
>
> >
> > Since dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu() is the only dwc caller, maybe the
> > parent_bus_addr change should go *there* instead of in the callers?
>
> I am not sure I understand your means.
>
> EP and RC parts need call dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(). EP and RC use
> difference method to get outbound windows informaiton. So can't move it
> into dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu().
>
> Frank
Bjorn:
I saw you have not picked all of these patches during you rework
pci git branches.
I know you are busy, do you have chance to pick left patch for 6.14.
Frank
> >
> > Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists