[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250123190422.GA1215672@bhelgaas>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:04:22 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] PCI: dwc: Use devicetree 'ranges' property to get
rid of cpu_addr_fixup() callback
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 10:21:36AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 10:42:37AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:29:16PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:14:00PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 02:44:20PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > > parent_bus_addr in struct of_range can indicate address information just
> > > > > ahead of PCIe controller. Most system's bus fabric use 1:1 map between
> > > > > input and output address. but some hardware like i.MX8QXP doesn't use 1:1
> > > > > map.
> ...
> I saw you have not picked all of these patches during you rework
> pci git branches.
>
> I know you are busy, do you have chance to pick left patch for 6.14.
This series had a mix of things: several patches related to
.cpu_addr_fixup(), plus several unrelated ones for PHY mode and i.MX8Q
support. I think I picked up all the unrelated ones.
.cpu_addr_fixup() is a generic problem that affects dwc (dra7xx, imx6,
artpec6, intel-gw, visconti), cadence (cadence-plat), and now
apparently microchip.
I deferred these because I'm hoping we can come up with a more generic
solution that's easier to apply across all these cases. I don't
really want to merge something that immediately needs to be reworked
for other drivers.
A few of the things I wonder about:
- dw_pcie_get_parent_addr() has no DWC dependencies, so it doesn't
make sense to me to have it be DWC-specific and copy and pasted
to other places that need something similar.
- It doesn't seem elegant to iterate through for_each_pci_range() in
devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(), then again in
dw_pcie_host_init() for io_bus_addr, then again in
dw_pcie_iatu_setup() for each window. Maybe that's the best we
can do, but maybe there's a way to capture what we need on the
first time through.
- The connection between .cpu_addr_fixup() and use_parent_dt_ranges
is clear in the patches remove a .cpu_addr_fixup(), but not in the
DWC patches on the other end.
- Ideally, "use_parent_dt_ranges" would be the default and we
wouldn't have a flag to indicate that, and drivers would have to
opt out instead of opt in. They basically already do that by
implementing .cpu_addr_fixup(), so maybe we can take advantage of
that fact.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists