lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250124135203.040d0852@foz.lan>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 13:52:03 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Leonardo BrĂ¡s <leobras.c@...il.com>, Vignesh Raman
 <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>, kernelci@...ts.linux.dev,
 linuxtv-ci@...uxtv.org, dave.pigott@...labora.com, mripard@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, gustavo.padovan@...labora.com,
 pawiecz@...labora.com, spbnick@...il.com, tales.aparecida@...il.com,
 workflows@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
 kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, nfraprado@...labora.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
 cocci@...ia.fr, Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr, laura.nao@...labora.com,
 kernel@...labora.com, torvalds@...uxfoundation.org,
 gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, daniels@...labora.com,
 helen.koike@...labora.com, shreeya.patel@...labora.com,
 denys.f@...labora.com, nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com,
 louis.chauvet@...tlin.com, hamohammed.sa@...il.com, melissa.srw@...il.com,
 simona@...ll.ch, airlied@...il.com, Tim.Bird@...y.com, broonie@...nel.org,
 groeck@...gle.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
 michel.daenzer@...lbox.org, sakari.ailus@....fi, jarkko@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for
 Kernel Testing

Em Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:12:50 +0200
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> escreveu:

> > It's been a few years since I first thought on finding a good way of helping
> > kernel developers testing their patches, while making use of the free runner
> > minutes Gitlab offers. It can greatly simplify the testing for people who are
> > new to kernel development, or students trying to understand it better.
> > 
> > And this patchset allows that to happen :)
> > 
> > Actually, I spoke to Helen last year, and to enable it to run on the free
> > Gitlab-CI runners, there is a small extra patch which is needed:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240327013055.139494-2-leobras@redhat.com/  

Sounds interesting!

> Gitlab as an open-source software project (the community edition) is one
> thing, but can we please avoid advertising specific proprietary services
> in the kernel documentation ?

Every time Gitlab is mentioned, the brand of the company that
developed it and has been providing proprietary services is also
advertised. If you're not happy with that, you should move to use
a git forge developed by some open source community.

The way I see, the best would be if the CI integration could work
with more than one type of forge and being able to use any
free Git??b-CI runners that would be available for developers to
use, as this would allow testing more subsystems with CI, thus
increasing code quality.

Thanks,
Mauro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ