[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173774375451.3015659.10376753884780529993.b4-ty@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:35:54 -0800
From: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <quic_vthiagar@...cinc.com>,
Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@...cinc.com>,
Wen Gong <quic_wgong@...cinc.com>,
Karthikeyan Periyasamy <quic_periyasa@...cinc.com>,
Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu <quic_pradeepc@...cinc.com>,
Aditya Kumar Singh <aditya.kumar.singh@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Balamurugan Selvarajan <quic_bselvara@...cinc.com>,
Ramya Gnanasekar <quic_rgnanase@...cinc.com>,
P Praneesh <quic_ppranees@...cinc.com>,
Bhagavathi Perumal S <quic_bperumal@...cinc.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ath12k@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-current] wifi: ath12k: fix handling of 6 GHz rules
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 21:51:38 +0530, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote:
> In the US country code, to avoid including 6 GHz rules in the 5 GHz rules
> list, the number of 5 GHz rules is set to a default constant value of 4
> (REG_US_5G_NUM_REG_RULES). However, if there are more than 4 valid 5 GHz
> rules, the current logic will bypass the legitimate 6 GHz rules.
>
> For example, if there are 5 valid 5 GHz rules and 1 valid 6 GHz rule, the
> current logic will only consider 4 of the 5 GHz rules, treating the last
> valid rule as a 6 GHz rule. Consequently, the actual 6 GHz rule is never
> processed, leading to the eventual disabling of 6 GHz channels.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] wifi: ath12k: fix handling of 6 GHz rules
commit: 64a1ba4072b34af1b76bf15fca5c2075b8cc4d64
Best regards,
--
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists