linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Add prog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20ad3071-2140-470e-90c0-96fc8f74ff2d@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:49:14 +0800
From: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...il.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, ast@...nel.org,
 daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, haoluo@...gle.com,
 jolsa@...nel.org, qmo@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Add prog_kfunc feature probe

在 2025/1/24 08:42, Eduard Zingerman 写道:
> On Fri, 2025-01-24 at 01:05 +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
>> More and more kfunc functions are being added to the kernel.
>> Different prog types have different restrictions when using kfunc.
>> Therefore, prog_kfunc probe is added to check whether it is supported,
>> and the use of this api will be added to bpftool later.
>>
>> Change list:
>> - v1 -> v2:
>>    - check unsupported prog type like probe_bpf_helper
>>    - add off parameter for module btf
>>    - chenk verifier info when kfunc id invalid
>>
>> Revisions:
>> - v1
>>    https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250122171359.232791-1-chen.dylane@gmail.com
>>
>> Tao Chen (2):
>>    libbpf: Add libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc API
>>    selftests/bpf: Add libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc API selftests
>>
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                        | 17 ++++++-
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |  1 +
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c                 | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/libbpf_probes.c  | 35 ++++++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> 
> Hi Tao,
> 
> Looks like something is wrong with the way the patch was generated:
> - patchwork link:
>    https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20250123170555.291896-2-chen.dylane@gmail.com/
> - error message:
>    https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/8395
> 
>      Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(128)
>        cmdline: git am --3way
>        stdout: 'Applying: libbpf: Add libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc API
>      Patch failed at 0001 libbpf: Add libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc API
>      When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
>      If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
>      To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".'
>        stderr: 'error: corrupt patch at line 103
>      error: could not build fake ancestor
>      hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch'
> 
> I get the same error when trying to apply locally,
> could you please double check?
> 
> Thanks,
> Eduard
> 

Hi, Eduard, thank you for your reply, i tried it out, and it turns out 
it's really my problem. I will resend it in v3.

-- 
Best Regards
Dylane Chen