[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <06196213-3106-4b69-a15d-4b2e4ac6f187@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 15:28:29 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
"Anna-Maria Gleixner" <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Richard Cochran" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-clock: Remove duplicate ioctl handler
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025, at 11:20, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> static int posix_clock_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *fp)
> {
> int err;
> @@ -174,7 +154,7 @@ static const struct file_operations
> posix_clock_file_operations = {
> .open = posix_clock_open,
> .release = posix_clock_release,
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> - .compat_ioctl = posix_clock_compat_ioctl,
> + .compat_ioctl = posix_clock_ioctl,
> #endif
I would remove the #ifdef/#endif as well here. I would also suggest
using compat_ptr_ioctl(), so on s390 the pointers get converted
correctly, even if it clears the upper bit on the integer arguments.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists