[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z5e9g3QUHVE-imrU@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:08:19 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel: Be more careful about dup_mmap() failures and
uprobe registering
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 12:02:21PM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
>
> In the even that there is a failure during dup_mmap(), the maple tree
"event". Although the writing is a little clumsy here. You could just
say "If there is a failure". But that begs the question of what kind of
failure, and I think it's only a memory allocation failure? So you
could say
"If a memory allocation fails during dup_mmap(),"
> can be left in an unsafe state for other iterators besides the exit
> path. All the locks are dropped before the exit_mmap() call (in
> mm/mmap.c), but the incomplete mm_struct can be reached through (at
> least) the rmap finding the vmas which have a pointer back to the
> mm_struct.
>
> Up to this point, there have been no issues with being able to find an
> mm_struct that was only partially initialised. Syzbot was able to make
> the incomplete mm_struct fail with recent forking changes, so it has
> been proven unsafe to use the mm_struct that hasn't been initialised, as
> referenced in the link below.
>
> Although 8ac662f5da19f ("fork: avoid inappropriate uprobe access to
> invalid mm") fixed the uprobe access, it does not completely remove the
> race.
>
> This patch sets the MMF_OOM_SKIP to avoid the iteration of the vmas on
> the oom side (even though this is extremely unlikely to be selected as
> an oom victim in the race window), and sets MMF_UNSTABLE to avoid other
> potential users from using a partially initialised mm_struct.
>
> When registering vmas for uprobe, skip the vmas in an mm that is marked
> unstable. Modifying a vma in an unstable mm may cause issues if the mm
> isn't fully initialised.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6756d273.050a0220.2477f.003d.GAE@google.com/
> Fixes: d240629148377 ("fork: use __mt_dup() to duplicate maple tree in dup_mmap()")
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@...edance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> ---
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250123205849.793810-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com/
>
> Changes since:
> v1
> - Added check_stable_address_space() to uprobe code - Thanks Lorenzo
> - Added Oleg & Masami to Cc list.
>
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 4 ++++
> kernel/fork.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index fa04b14a7d723..90ebcdbad05ca 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <linux/srcu.h>
> +#include <linux/oom.h> /* check_stable_address_space */
>
> #include <linux/uprobes.h>
>
> @@ -1260,6 +1261,9 @@ register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *new)
> * returns NULL in find_active_uprobe_rcu().
> */
> mmap_write_lock(mm);
> + if (check_stable_address_space(mm))
> + goto unlock;
> +
> vma = find_vma(mm, info->vaddr);
> if (!vma || !valid_vma(vma, is_register) ||
> file_inode(vma->vm_file) != uprobe->inode)
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index ded49f18cd95c..20b2120f019ca 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -760,7 +760,8 @@ static __latent_entropy int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> mt_set_in_rcu(vmi.mas.tree);
> ksm_fork(mm, oldmm);
> khugepaged_fork(mm, oldmm);
> - } else if (mpnt) {
> + } else {
> +
> /*
> * The entire maple tree has already been duplicated. If the
> * mmap duplication fails, mark the failure point with
> @@ -768,8 +769,18 @@ static __latent_entropy int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> * stop releasing VMAs that have not been duplicated after this
> * point.
> */
> - mas_set_range(&vmi.mas, mpnt->vm_start, mpnt->vm_end - 1);
> - mas_store(&vmi.mas, XA_ZERO_ENTRY);
> + if (mpnt) {
> + mas_set_range(&vmi.mas, mpnt->vm_start, mpnt->vm_end - 1);
> + mas_store(&vmi.mas, XA_ZERO_ENTRY);
> + /* Avoid OOM iterating a broken tree */
> + set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
> + }
> + /*
> + * The mm_struct is going to exit, but the locks will be dropped
> + * first. Set the mm_struct as unstable is advisable as it is
> + * not fully initialised.
> + */
> + set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags);
> }
> out:
> mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
> --
> maple-tree mailing list
> maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org
> https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/maple-tree
Powered by blists - more mailing lists