[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250127130342.4e5d1f9e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:03:42 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, "Russell King (Oracle)"
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu
<joabreu@...opsys.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] net: stmmac: Fix usage of maximum queue number
macros
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:47:29 +0800 Huacai Chen wrote:
> > There is another aspect to this. We are adding warnings saying that
> > the device tree blob is broken. That should encourage users to upgrade
> > their device tree blob. But most won't find any newer version. If this
> > goes into net-next, the roll out will be a lot slower, developers on
> > the leading edge will find the DT issue and submit a DT patch. By the
> > time this is in a distro kernel, maybe most of the DT issues will
> > already be fixed?
> Goto net or goto net-next are both fine to me, I just think this
> series should be backported to stable branches. There are lots of
> patches backported even though they are less important than this
> series (maybe not in the network subsystem).
Please remove the Fixes tags when reposting.
--
pw-bot: defer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists