[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ca970e7-cc9a-4853-86de-5f01dc6d82a2@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 10:17:18 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@...cinc.com>, ath12k@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: wireless: describe the ath12k AHB
module
On 28/01/2025 10:10, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote:
> Add device-tree bindings for the ATH12K module found in the IPQ5332
> device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@...cinc.com>
> ---
> .../net/wireless/qcom,ath12k-ahb.yaml | 317 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 317 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath12k-ahb.yaml
It was v4, now v1? So entire previous discussion and feedback is
missing? Go to previous series and implement entire feedback. Then use
proper versioning, proper changelog and make it obvious/understandable
to us, instead of sending v1 after v4 in entirely separate thread.
I also do not understand why this is sent to arm soc. That's wireless patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists